The supporters of Natural Birth Education wish the mothers to be better educated for the mother's rights for a Signed Birth Contract for what cannot be done to the mother's body or her fetus during child birth, from conception to birth of the child, and thereafter.

Bogus Medical Policies set by the Tri Council policies of Canada, have allowed harvesting of the newborn baby. This harvesting of babies is also being allowed by bogus policies set by medical experts, the Society of Obstetricians and Gyncologists of Canada. Policies that endanger the newborn child and the mother, too, are Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89 May 2000. The letter sent to the Green Party to create this as an Women's Issue is as follows:

The Green Party
Attention: Party Leader

I have information that the Liberal Ministry of Health, and Health Canada, and Ministers of Justice and the Health Critic of the Opposition Party have absolutely refused to unbiasedally investigate and/or to protect the Canadian babies from being harvested of their placenta blood, that contains inteferon and stem cells, and other valuable blood suspension needed by the owner/infant.

The attitude was since the babies didn't normally die, the harvesting done without informed consent would continue. If the babied did die, across Canada, the neonate would NOT be respected by having a proper investigation for medical malpractice or infanticide. Some babies may be put down, if under 5-pounds, as deemed not an asset to society, but harvested, then of all internal parts.

The Tri Council policy committee have set $400 Million for Federal grant money for research. And, some of that was for stem cell research after robbing babies of their own blood by early clamping. This is a kept secret from most parents, and some parents not adequately informed, have allowed their babies blood donated to public or private stem cell cord blood banks.

The labs and administration and the doctors (doing separate billings) are taking 20 to 50 percent total blood volume from every baby born into hands of licensed medical persons, including some unethical midwives. The medical policies allowing this are bogus, and must be investigated in each Province and Territory, where no dissent or investigation has gone on for many years.

It makes no difference for c-section, premature or full term and vaginal birthed babies, because all are harvested of their placenta nutrients, of valuable interferon and stem cells.

Amount of blood created, is about one ounce per total pounds of the child. Figure it this way, a 9-pound baby only created a total blood volume of 10 ounces (300 ml)from conception to birth. What do you think the normal take of the babies is, from stem cell blood banks? Contact them in Ontario, Cells for Life. They announce to the public, it is between 80 ml and 180 ml, per child, who is early harvested. Such cord blood banks don't have to tell the doctors to do hasty clamping, because the policies set by SOGC have done that for them. The private stem cell blood banks, just encourage hasty clamping for the most blood harvedsted. They are not informing the parents of the facts of anemic condition to result of their struggling babies, deprived up to 60 percent total blood volume, per harvested child.

It is a crime, not reported. Involved in the silence, a conspiracy of silence and promoting of harvesting of babies for stem cell research have been all the MAJOR news medias, in particular, CBC. The large political news media are, apparently, protecting political schemes to exploit babies and are taking advantage, too, of the uneducated mothers, on this issue.

They have been likely protecting the profits of private medical suppliers of blood components who do sell the blood for stem cell research, and interferon and other hormones extracted from the blood, some being: white cells, that fight infections; the red cells (mature)that carry oxygen to all cells; the vitamins and minerals...these are depleted, and are in low supply to the child for needed growth and well-being. The components of the child's blood go to tissue banks. The tissues from the placenta are used for burn victims. Even the circumcised babies had their foreskin, unknowingly, sent to burn tissue banks, too, as is sent the umbilical cord and membranes taken from around the placenta. Nothing may be wasted unless the baby tested for disease.

This tissue and hormone take from the baby's deprived placenta blood may be considered a worthy cause. But it is all done without true informed consent and it is a form of privacy invasions. This is because the DNA and genetic codes of each child are put into the hands of others, not known or approved by the legal guardians of the child, the parents.

It all sounds fine...but it is done without true informed consent and the babies, mostly living, were violated, and were not given equal protection by the Nation's duty of the criminal laws, or equal security of person, alleged by the Constitution of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which states all are protected equally, regardless of age (moment's old); by sex (male or female); by color or race (blood types); or by mental or physical disadvantage (helpless child).

Breach of Trust violation of Faith:

Some people, if they knew would be offended as it is against their faith to receive human tissue or donate the same, and do not expect their babies to be part of doing this type of tissue donating and they can't stop it. The taking of the baby's placenta blood is all done before the parents could stop the assault, or attempted murder of their child, certainly, the hasty clamping knowingly weakened the child. But, in most cases, the evidence is quickly destroyed by the allowance of destroying of evidence by every Administration Hospital's policy board, in Canada, or so, it seems.

It is all secret and persons are in shock that each community hospital has most of their doctors doing hasty clamping, or being silent on those doctors that practice this, and do not have informed consent to impose it on any child.

The children of a particular color, race, or blood type can be the most vulnerable, such as European or Asian blood. Most hospitals can have the means to post wanted blood types, and the rewards of compensation to the collector of the blood sought, the financial reward may be up to and more than $30,000 per ounce of blood.

The doctors, then may act as agents for the hospital who then may market the placenta and the placenta blood trapped there by early clamping.

It is a violation of trust, and needs to have an Official Commissioned Inquiry. This is essential, particularly, to the increase of autism in Canada, and cancers and brain tumors of our youth, and every internal disease, and holes in the heart, and murmurs, to name some of the problems associated with low blood volume, not to mention behavior problems, not understood by our society, so prevalent in youth, of today.

One in ten youth it has had been reported in the press,in Ontario, that these students are alleged disturbed. In that Province, there are at least two or more private stem cell blood banks, harvesting the babies early clamped, or the allowance of it. These students have also experienced over 60 percent failure in the testing in the school system. In the USA, the decline of intelligence was stated by Doris Haire in a report she gave to Birth Without Borders, in 1997. See www.lotusbirth.com

The association of declining of intelligence, may all be due to the clamping of the lifeline, the quality of life of the child, so early deprived of oxygenated blood.

I allege that the bogus medical policies found in Policies of ACOG (Educational Bulletin #216, November 1995, cancelled in Jan/Feb 2002) and the Merck Manual, who state "One breath, and clamp the child", and currently in the SOGC's policies, may be a crime. The polices are merely set up as a likely alibi to avoid criminal prosecution. The policies are bogus medical policies allowed by all levels of governments.

I allege this is a crime because equal security of persons, offenses against the person are not respected to the child, and equal security of person. If the neonate the newborn child's care and treatment is not an election issue, and covered up, in all election area, it is a crime and offense against the persons, as I see this. My views are based in my last four years of trying to reach all levels of government, local to Federal.

Will the Green Party speak up, if given a chance, or when they go door to door? I hope so. Just show them the petition what is going on for the past four years, www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814.

The medical issue was ignored, when I first wrote all levels of the government and the various elected officials and none would protect babies or mothers in Canada. Why not? Do they fear the medical control groups? If so, why?

Those of the powers that be have undermined the Nations laws, to the pregnant women, poorly educated on this issue in each community, and violated at each and every hospital in Canada.

In the United States, they had at least one doctor stand against bogus policies and he, Dr. George M. Morley, www.cordclamping.com saw the canceling of ACOG's Bulletin #216 November 1995.

In the cancellation of that Education Bulletin, ACOG did not go public. Consequently, many medical persons still follow the bogus training, and do not question impaired and compromised children to that bogus training, weakening all babies so deprived from knowingly 20 to 50 percent or more total blood volume.

See a case-law-examples of compromised children, two children interrupted of their circulation system, the Chow-case-law, Ontario Canada, by Sommers and Roth, and the Ing-case-law, ibid.

But that bogus bulletin #216, was copied by SOGC, in their Policy No. 89, May 2000. It has not yet been cancelled, so Canadian babies continue to be harvested by a bogus policy set by the professionals.

These medical professionals, and the principals they may work for, likely have a conflict of interest in their stake of stem cell blood banks, and various organizations they may represent, mostly non-profit societies that advocated the use of stem cells, taking from unprotected newborn babies.

I can give more information if you call me, 1-250-782-9223 and letters written in the past, are at: www.123-baby-birth.com See Policies.

We must questions why professional organizations had no ethical policies and best practice possible standards set on this issue?

See the letter from Mr. Gary Mar, Minister of Health and Wellness in Alberta. He wrote me, personally, and stated it was ok to harvest the placenta blood and use it in the experiments of the day at the Royal Alexander Hospital...and to take the blood without informed consent of the legal guardian of the child, the parents.

It was all been done secretly...all the parents had was a living child...and some infants have died with further harvesting, after early clamping, too. Ten to 15 percent of total blood volume was reported taken in Canadian studies, every 2nd and 3rd day. That would be likely the new stem cells created and taken, not given the baby the benefit of newly created blood cells. All organs then harvested, when the baby died, not just the blood components and suspensions in the human blood plasma.

The coroners are not investigating deaths of any babies, in Canada, if they were born and died in the care of a licensed medical person.

Even ambulance medics are now told to clamp the pulsating cord.....and some are told to tie the cord off with any dirty rag...the importance not in being clean...but cutting the cord, while it yet was doing the child some benefit.

This is all in bogus policies used as alibis to escape criminal prosecution of endangering the newborn child; or so it seems.

The medical policies and current medical manuals are bogus. This is not opinion because the facts are visual.

The size of the placenta and the amount of blood syringed from the placenta are medical facts, yet concealed, and not recorded on each child's own medical charts.

That is a concealment and a cover-up, the medical persons saying it was not important to "them" to record that information. Yet, it is imperative of proper review of latent disorders to any child so violated of equal security of person and protection and enforcement of the Nation's laws.

The medical policies, and those allowing them, can visually be tested and seen to be bogus if put on a video tape and the amount of blood drained, then, from the placenta.

The umbilical cord, when early clamped, can be seen to be red, firm, and pulsating; or will pulsate again, if the child's heart is re-started.

It is best to revive the compromised child, where is, how is, naturally, left on the placenta cord. This is wise and does no harm. But harm is done by removing the child and reviving elsewhere...time is essential, and taking the child to another area for revival is not wise.

Equipment can be taken to the child, for revival on the cord, no matter how inconvenient, even for multiple births. NO child need ever be taken off the cord, unless, the cord tore, suggesting a "dropped" child, being born from too high of a operating table.

Most births that are vaginal,the mother could birth on clean low mats with supporting secure equipment to birth in any gravity position or a sideways, forward position of birth, opening her birth canal, by 30 percent more.

The reverse if she births on her back or semi-sitting birth positions, most harmful to the mother and the child. These flat on the back birth positions often cause broken ribs to the child, or head damage, and cause the use of tools, forceps that do cause more damage to the head or ribs; and may lead to broken collar bones of the child, or broken pelvic bones to the mother. The flat/semi-sitting birth positions were known to be dangerous, since 1913.

The child can be seen going limp, after hasty clamping, any clamping on the pulsating cord or any child that ought to have been revived on the cord.

Again, for facts of circulation interruption of the neonate, See this case-law: Chow, Ontario Canada, Sommers and Roth....The child had a delayed correction after going limp after a bogus reason to clamp a cord around the neck.

The Correct method of logic would be to put a finger, or sponge between the cord and the neck to prevent neck injury...as the newborn child yet is breathing through the cord not the mouth, or nose, at birth.

As long as the child remains on the lifeline and revived on the lifeline, the child will be fine, in most instances. They pink up from their normal birth color, bluish. So if deprived of blood and caused to be hastily clamped, the child is going to be, logically, anemic, and have low blood volume and pressure. That means low blood volume and oxygen to the brain and central nervous system.

Does this make sense to you? It could win the Green Party many seats, if the Party Candidate were to support informed choices and better education for self-determination in child birth....

Many women of the past 3 and 4 generations were not educated, and that is true to this day of their legal rights to a signed Birth Contract of what cannot be done to their bodies,or their babies, like the use of drugs and the endangering to both the mother and the child by hasty umbilical cord clamping.

See Birth Contract at www.lotusbirth.com YOU, the Green Party may win, many seats if you support a Just Society, of equity and fairness. This is if you make this a political issue, that the past parties did not regard or give respect to the neonate, or the pregnant mothers to be properly educated, from K-12, to continuing education. Such as would be in prenatal classes and what is bogus, currently taught at most universities on this issue to present and future medical persons, including surgeons.

It is anticipated that the Green Party will get all the women's votes and children, now struggling from the past care and treatment of early clamping.

We are a rich resource Nations, and we can look after our compromised and injured people, of the past, on this issue.

Promise the injured a hearing with compensation for any violation at birth, and the matter to go before a proper Commissioned Inquiry, like the Kremer Report, on the Canadian blood. After that report, the RCMP now have a Blood Task Force, laying criminal charges on the authorities that contaminated the blood system, and failed to warn the public. This is a similar issue and it is similar to the Walkerton community where the officials failed to warn its citizens of contaminated water.

This issue needs an Official inquiry, too, and for compensation to the victims, and criminal charges to the executives who approved bogus SOGC policies, such as Policy #71, December 1998 and Policy #89 May 2000 directed by the experts. See SOGC Policies for the proper links at www.lotusbirth.com

Please see this petition to the Queen and the Federal Government and its Two Territories, again, www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/102580814

I hope to see "all" signatures of the Green Party signed in good faith. Put in GP, before your name, to identify your group as caring of the children and the pregnant mothers to be better educated for true informed choices.

The petition signed would indicate if the green party would protect Canadian Babies and Mothers, Too. You would certainly get attention if you protected the rights of mothers to have at their informed choice for primal birth traditions, returned. This may be in the homes or in rented rooms in hospitals for water births, not drugs. This means the mother may call for help, only if and as required, necessary, for a hands off birth.

Please advise if you can support the women, presently pregnant, or planning a family, on this issue?

The women, alone, must decided what is in her best interest and her child's. The pregnant mother must not be treated with less respect of informed choices that is given to men or women who do not have babies, but are self-determiners in their care of health care services. But, today, in most instances, the pregnancy policies and training are being imposed without informed choice on the pregnant moms.

The doctors when they take up to 50 percent of total blood volume, from the placenta, early clamped off, then say the struggling child has bad genes, or it is the mother's fault, or unknown causes if the child is weak. And, there is no proper investigation of their care by training, or following blindly unreasonable teachings.

Accounting source documents, income to medical persons, and to labs and hospitals can reveal, by the allowance of the court, for such access to information, that many did sell the placenta and the placenta blood for stem cell experiments.

Again, this is political. Politics protect profits, mostly, and not the rights of the individual to be protected against those making profits. But the Nation's laws and duty is to protect all equally and with equal security of person.

The bogus medical policies, are alleged to be violating the equal protection of the new born child. Yes, most victims have lived, but they are weakened babies. We have an epidemic of autism, holes in the heart, brain tumors,lung disorders, increase of CP and MS, the latter now reported in babies as young a 13 months, generally, an older disease. This is why -- it is the interruption of the circulation system, and needlessly imposed on most births, attended by the professional.

Please contact me, a 1-250-782-9223
Donna Young, Natural Birth Education,
Box 504, Dawson Creek, BC, V1G 4H4
Canada

Click to Return

http://www.prweb.com/emailmember.php Use this to send a message to the Green Political Party, if they make this issue an issue, they will be paid attention to by most women and mothers yet to be, tell them so:

HOW to send a confirmation of the above letter as victims of babies damaged by the Bogus Policy #216 November 1995, cancelled but not effectively in Jan/Feb 2002, in the USA. Babies born after that date, were not to be harvested or endangered by early cord clamping, eh.

Donna.